For researchers

You know the methodology. Stop losing time to the tools.

For residents, clinician-researchers, PhD students, postdocs, and junior faculty running studies with full autonomy.

The real cost

The pain isn’t competence. It’s coordination.

01REDCap or Google Forms, SPSS or R, Zotero, Word, and an email thread — per project.
02No continuity between tools: export, reformat, and re-enter at every hand-off.
03Co-author and supervisor coordination on top of an already full week.
04Publication pressure, with hours lost to tool-juggling instead of research.

Analysis

Statistics chosen for clinical data.

Tests suggested from your variable types and design — including Fisher’s exact and diagnostic accuracy from a 2×2 table in the free set.

Planned for paid plans: meta-analysis with forest plots, Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression, and linear mixed models

Analysis — Sleep & exam stress

Data · 84 rows

id	psqiord	stressord
R-001	9	24
R-002	5	17
R-003	12	29
R-004	4	15
R-005	8	21

Suggested test

Results

Illustrative preview — fictional study, not real data.

Collaboration

Permissions that match how your team works.

Co-author, supervisor, and viewer are starting presets. Turn editing or task management on or off for anyone — a hands-on PI gets edit rights with one switch.

Project settings — Collaborators

AAnaCo-authorCan editManage tasks
GDr. GiorgiSupervisor / PICan editManage tasks
MMariamViewerCan editManage tasks

Roles are presets — you can change either permission for anyone.

Illustrative preview — fictional study, not real data.

Write-up

From analysis to manuscript without retyping.

Results drafted from the analysis you ran, in a pre-structured manuscript. You review, accept, or edit — nothing is inserted on its own.

Write-up — Results

Analysis

Spearman's ρ	0.41
95% CI	[0.21, 0.58]
p	< .001
n	84

Re-run on 84 responses

Draft · Results

AI-assisted · not inserted yet

Of 84 respondents, poorer sleep quality was moderately associated with higher perceived stress during the exam period (Spearman’s ρ = 0.41, 95% CI [0.21, 0.58], p < .001).

AcceptEditDrafted from your analysis — never invented.

Illustrative preview — fictional study, not real data.

What we’re not claiming

The chain, not a better tool.

No single Oshki tool tries to beat the specialised one you already know. What no incumbent does is carry a project from idea to submission in one place — that’s the whole point.

Join the waitlist

Be first in when Oshki opens.

Two minutes: your role, the study you’re on or planning next, and the tools you use today. Optionally, a 15-minute call to tell us what’s missing.

— For medical & health-science students and researchers
— No launch date yet; we’ll email you when there is
— No spam. Unsubscribe or ask for deletion any time

Waitlist form not connected yet

Set TALLY_FORM_ID in lib/constants.ts to embed the Tally form here.